Backgrounding Calves

Backgrounding Calves

By Heather Smith Thomas

Backgrounding simply means growing calves bigger (after weaning) before they go into a finishing program. Some producers hold their calves to sell later as yearlings, and some buy light calves in the spring to put on grass in a stocker program and grow to a larger weight. Some put weaned calves into a confinement program and feed a growing ration until they are ready to go to a finishing facility. The calves might be on pasture with a supplement or in a confinement program on a growing ration—about 90 to 100 days of backgrounding.

This year things are a bit different, with high prices for calves and high cost of feed in many regions. Dr. Ron Gill, Texas A & M, Agrilife Extension, says that if you are buying calves to background, you have to look hard at pricing—in terms of what the calves are bringing today and what you might expect them to bring when you sell them.

“In our area the cost of feed is so high that you need to carefully calculate the cost of gain and value of gain. Right now, the value of gain is borderline regarding whether you can make money doing this. It may be different if these are your own calves that you are keeping and feeding and looking farther down the road to what those carcasses might be worth. There are many things to consider,” he says.

Having your own calves and accessible feed sources may work out better than if you are trying to buy calves and buy feed that must be hauled very far. “Buying calves right now is a gamble,” says Gill.

“I think there is a lot of risk involved, especially when calves are worth so much right off the cow or after weaning. When they are worth that much it’s harder to talk yourself into keeping them. Even if calves are not preconditioned, they are bringing pretty good money this year, but there is still about a $10-$12 premium in some areas for the 45-60 day weaned calves.”

It’s important to identify your end target. “If you will be selling them directly as beef or you are part of a supply chain you want to keep cattle in, or keep cattle coming to, this may change the picture a little—to maintain those relationships,” he says. Each producer’s situation is a little different; you have to figure out what will work for you.

“There is no blanket advice that can be given. There are many tough decisions—whether to keep calves longer, or keep heifers. It might be good to keep them longer, in terms of inventory, but you don’t know if things will change next year and whether there will be pasture. Some people are restocking now, but that’s a gamble, too. Many people got burned the last time they tried to keep heifers and background them through winter to sell as bred heifers or ready to breed,” says Gill. And there’s no crystal ball in terms of what the weather will be.

“A lot will depend on available feed resources. If you will be purchasing calves and backgrounding them, you’ll need to find calves you can purchase somewhat under the average market price. Then your margins might be a little better when you get them straightened out and on feed. Success with this will often depend on what you value those cattle in at or what you actually purchase them for—and their health.”

If the calves are coming out of drought areas and might be stressed, they may not have strong immunities. You don’t want a health wreck. “Any time calves are this high priced, the risk of one of them dying takes away all the profit. We’ve seen a higher incidence of respiratory disease in calves over the last few years, even in good years. I think genetics play a role in this. You want to know as much as possible about the cattle. In general, the more straight-bred they are, the more likely they are to get sick. A good crossbred animal has more vigor, performance, and immunity,” he says.

“These are things to think about when buying calves, to have as little risk as possible. If you are backgrounding, maybe you can find someone who has weaned their calves for 45 to 60 days and you can just take them and go.

That would be the safest bet,” says Gill.

“Like any margin business, do your budgets realistically. Don’t underestimate health issues or overestimate performance. It might pay to look at some of the pricing mechanisms—maybe locking in a certain price—to eliminate a big loss.”

Probably the value of calves coming out of a backgrounding program and into the finishing yards will be pretty high, but we don’t know. It always pays to do some number crunching, though some people just keep backgrounding calves because that’s what they’ve always done. “This happens a lot in most segments of the beef industry; you might make a little money two years and then lose it all over the next three! It just seems there is more risk this year, because of instability of the market (regarding cost of feed as well as cattle). If you can limit or mitigate the effect of those unknowns it probably pays to keep doing what you know how to do, in terms of backgrounding, whether doing custom backgrounding or backgrounding your own calves,” says Gill.

Feed sources are important; it helps to have local supplies rather than something that must be hauled a long distance. “With the cost of fuel, if you have to haul very far it’s tough!” he says.

If you are not in a persistent drought and can produce your own hay (or buy local hay reasonably priced) and have a consistent forage source, feeding cattle is more feasible. “There are still a lot of byproducts like gluten and distillers grains available for mixing rations, so the main thing would be access and trucking.”

Backgrounding In Missouri
Neal and Linda Niendick and son Ben own a feedlot and backgrounding business near Wellington, Missouri, When Ben came home from college in 2016 they added onto the operation to be able to background more calves.

“We do a lot of custom feeding and own a few of the cattle ourselves,” says Ben. “Calves usually come to us weighing between 600 and 650 pounds and we feed them for 150 or more days, to get them up to about 850 and sometimes 900 pounds—ready to go out west to get finished.”

There are very few finishing facilities in Missouri; most calves go to feedlots in western Kansas and some to Nebraska. Conditions in Missouri aren’t ideal for finishing cattle because weather is hot and humid in summer and muddy in winter. “Another disadvantage is that we are farther from the processing plants. This might change in the future, to where there could be more finishing opportunities here,” he says.

Missouri produces a lot of cattle (it is usually second or third in the nation for cow-calf numbers) and most calves are backgrounded before being sent to finishing yards. “Many of the calves we get come from sale barns, but some of our customers send calves off their farms and retain ownership. Some customers send calves they buy at the sale barns,” says Ben.

He and his dad usually feed about 1500 calves, with numbers fluctuating depending on time of year. The facility is strictly a confinement situation. “In our area there’s not much pasture; it’s all crop land. We run a few cows on some grass, but we only have 25 acres of pasture,” he explains.

Their facility is close to several sale barns, and there are many cow-calf producers in this area. “Being close to Kansas is an advantage, too. The sale barns here have good runs every week. There is a great supply of cattle; we don’t have any trouble keeping our pens full.”

When calves arrive, many of them are ready for another round of vaccinations. “We usually process them upon arrival. One of the things we did when I got back from college and became more active in the operation was to improve our working facility so we could handle calves as easily and smoothly as possible,” he says. They are coming from a variety of places and most of them are stressed already, so it’s important to not add more stress.

“We assess their condition. Some just came off grass or were weaned recently and may not know how to eat from a bunk. We determine what kind of ration to start them on,” Ben says.

Those calves go into pens close to the barn for the first week or two so they can be closely monitored for any signs of illness. “We keep a close eye on them, especially when it’s hot, and also in the winter; our winters can be pretty rough on them,” he says.

The calves are generally started on a high-roughage diet, and gradually bumped up to grower rations, gaining about 2 ½ pounds per day. “We don’t want to get them too fleshy until they reach the right frame size. We want them to just keep growing, without getting fat, so they can put on weight when they go west for finishing,” Ben explains.

With custom feeding, the rations may vary. Every customer is a little different regarding the goal for their cattle, and what they want them to gain. “We customize the ration for each group,” Ben says.

The farm grows all the feed necessary; the only things purchased are minerals and feed additives. “We can chop our own feed and do it at the right time, at the right stage of maturity,” Ben says. “We also combine our own corn, and have a roller mill, and don’t have to buy any corn. We work closely with a nutritionist from Great Plains Livestock Consulting in eastern Nebraska.” The cattle are always on harvested feed, since their backgrounding operation has no pasture for calves.

In winter the biggest challenge is keeping pens clean and minimizing mud. “We don’t want the cattle lying in mud, so we’ve built mounds in each pen so they can get up off the wettest ground,” Ben says.

In summer they put up shades. Studies have shown a 30-degree difference in ground temperature underneath the shade versus out in the sun. “As soon as we put up shades, the cattle use them; even the new arrivals figure it out pretty quick. We provide about 10 square feet of shade per head,” Ben says. This takes a lot of pressure off the water; they don’t need to drink quite as much, and they stay in the shade—and are not grouped around the waterers all the time. It’s important to have plenty of water space per head, with good capacity.

ASI and NCBA Release Video on Public Lands Movement Criteria During FMD Outbreak

ASI and NCBA Release Video on Public Lands Movement Criteria During FMD Outbreak

WASHINGTON (August 22, 2024) – The American Sheep Industry Association (ASI) worked with the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) and other stakeholders to develop movement decision criteria guidance addressing unique scenarios that would arise for federal lands grazers in the event of a foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak. A 5-minute video describes the project and resources and can be viewed on the Secure Sheep and Wool Supply (SSWS) and Secure Beef Supply (SBS) websites under the Public Land Grazing pages. This has resulted from a multi-year cooperative project funded by a grant from the USDA National Animal Disease Preparedness and Response Program (NADPRP).

“ASI appreciates the time and effort put in by the Advisory Group as well as Dr. Danelle Bickett-Weddle, consultant with Preventalytics, in the creation of materials. This effort had multiple groups contribute to unique resources for sheep and cattle producers to prepare for, respond to, and enhance their resiliency for an FAD event,” said ASI Executive Director Peter Orwick. “This collaboration across the sheep and cattle industries with state and federal partners demonstrates impactful results for business continuity and a secure food supply.”

“An FMD outbreak on U.S. soil is expected it would cost the U.S. economy hundreds of millions of dollars. For years, the resources we have prepared have focused on mitigating losses on private land. Now, with the help of a wide spectrum of organizations including USDA, the Public Lands Council, State Animal Health Officials, and many more, we have comprehensive resources to help public lands ranchers whose livestock may be far from any infected herd have predictability for their operations in the event of an FMD outbreak,” said NCBA Executive Director of Government Affairs Kaitlynn Glover. “Livestock producers in the West are now more prepared than ever to work with federal lands agencies and animal health officials to make movement decisions with the development of this collaborative guidance.”

These resources are in addition to the enhanced biosecurity plans found on the SSWS and SBS websites. Industry input and participation was critical to identifying gaps for federal lands grazers and establishing the need for these specialized documents. The sheep and beef industries continue to work together to provide educational resources to best prepare producers, veterinarians, and other industry stakeholders before an FMD outbreak occurs.

Background

The U.S. is currently free of the FMD virus. The Secure Sheep and Wool Supply (SSWS) Plan and Secure Beef Supply (SBS) Plan for continuity of business provides opportunities for industry partners to voluntarily prepare before an FMD outbreak. If FMD were found in U.S. livestock, regulatory officials will limit the movement of animals and animal products to try and control the spread of this very contagious animal disease. Control areas will be established around infected premises and movement restrictions will be implemented. Given the nature of federal lands grazing, containment of livestock and mitigation of risk will require different strategies than private land containment measures. When the control areas encompass part or all of a public land grazing allotment, in one or more states, there are unique challenges for sheep and cattle producers to mitigate disease exposure risks. FMD is not a threat to public health or food safety.

###

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) has represented America’s cattle producers since 1898, preserving the heritage and strength of the industry through education and public policy.  As the largest association of cattle producers, NCBA works to create new markets and increase demand for beef.  Efforts are made possible through membership contributions. To join, contact NCBA at 1-866-BEEF-USA or membership@beef.org.

CONTACT:
Hunter Ihrman, hihrman@beef.org
Steve Johnson, srjohnson@beef.org

Pasture Rangeland Forage: A Marathon Not A Sprint

Pasture Rangeland Forage: A Marathon Not A Sprint

Article and photos courtesy of AgRisk Advisors

Droughts are a constant threat to the cow-calf business, impacting forage availability and driving up input costs. The Pasture Rangeland Forage (PRF) program offered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture can be a valuable tool to help manage these risks and provide financial security for your cattle operation.

Fortunately, there are risk management tools available to cattle producers. Among them is the Pasture Rangeland Forage Program (PRF) offered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture which has been available since 2007 but really took off when the rainfall index was expanded to the lower 48 in 2016.

While valuable, navigating PRF solo can be daunting even for seasoned ranchers. AgRisk Advisors, affiliated with Silveus Insurance Group, specializes in helping ranchers make PRF and other USDA insurance programs work for their operations.

Filling a Vital Need
“When we first started with this program, it was a new concept for many customers. Essentially, the program pays producers when precipitation falls below the historic average during a two-month timeframe,” explains Aaron Tattersall.

With customers in every state east of the Mississippi, AgRisk Advisors has nearly two decades of experience advising cow-calf producers on how to implement PRF into their operation.

“As PRF has grown popular, more inexperienced agents see an opportunity but lack the tools and experience,” cautions Aaron Kravig, a fifth-generation rancher and AgRisk Advisor.

According to Aaron Kravig, these pop-up agents rely on easy sales pitches, implying it’s a guaranteed deal, which frustrates seasoned advisors. Misuse of the program by these agents leaves a bad taste in the mouths of producers who have dealt with them.

What Exactly is PRF?
“From a producer standpoint,” says Kravig, speaking from personal experience, “it’s increasingly challenging to stay in production agriculture, especially for cow-calf operations. This is one of the few programs available for cattlemen.”

As a true insurance program, PRF provides a safety net for dry weather and the constant challenges faced by producers. More are warming up to implementing this program to sustain and extend their operations.

“It’s subsidized and offers a higher level of coverage than the FSA NAP (Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance ProgramNoninsured Crop Disaster Assistance) Program, and PRF has really helped producers over the years,” says Tattersall.

“It’s important for producers to budget for PRF for the long term and stick with it. It works over time,” notes Tattersall.

Tattersall adds that PRF allows flexibility in premiums by adjusting enrolled acres.

Eligibility is based on two factors (1) risk in the ground they are grazing and (2), ownership of livestock. Producers may insure ground they own or lease (including government agency land) to graze their livestock, notes Kravig.

AgRisk Advisors helps customers by mapping eligible land to determine coverage options. While headcount doesn’t affect eligibility, producers must own livestock and prove the land is used for grazing.

“I think PRF may benefit smaller-scale operations and newer operators,” continues Kravig, “by easing the pain of higher input prices.”

Considerations for Newcomers
For first-time PRF producers, AgRisk Advisors ensures it fits the budget. It may be best not to insure all acres at once.

“You can cover 100, 1,000, or 10,000 acres,” explains Kravig. “It’s not all or nothing.”

He adds that many customers start with a percentage of their acres and gradually increase over time, as they see how the program performs for their operation.

Overcoming Roadblocks
“I can speak personally from for my own operation in eastern Colorado,” shares Kravig. He recommends that ranchers don’t think of it as a short term deal, It’s a long-term commitment.

Tattersall provides some additional insight based on a study of Customer policies in 2023. Last year was one of the wetter years we’ve had in a while for many Western states.

“By the billing deadline last year, September 1, 2023, 70% of our customers experienced average to above average precip during the first five months of 2023. So, most of our customers received a premium bill.

“By the time the full coverage expired on the 2023 policies, only 30% of our customers had losses that didn’t fund their premium. In other words, the below-average precipitation during the late summer and fall triggered losses to fund their remaining premium. This shows that even in wet years, as long as your policy is set up the right way with an AgRisk Advisor, you’re going to be served well. And that was a wet year.”

This year, it’s been dry in the West, so most policies are expected to be funded by the time the premium comes due, depending on the operation’s location. The key point being emphasized is the importance of maintaining coverage for the long term.

Another common objection from any operation or business is the cost of premiums. While there are ways to adjust the premium to make it more manageable, such as enrolling fewer acres or selecting different coverage levels, a large premium in an average rainfall year can deter producers from continuing coverage. This again underscores the importance of long-term planning and an understanding of how the program works over multiple years.

Long-term Success Strategies
Engaging with the PRF program requires understanding its long-term benefits and commitment. This program is not a quick fix but rather is one designed to smooth out the roller coaster of inevitable dry weather.

AgRisk Advisors has seen producer interest in PRF increase significantly during drought periods.

“Anytime you get into a drought pattern, you’re obviously going to have more interest from producers,” says Kravig. “If it’s been raining every month, you’re probably not thinking, ‘Oh, hey, I need protection against a lack of precipitation.’

But it should be noted that perceived short-term results of PRF can discourage producers.

“We’ve all run into producers who quit the program after a year or two because it wasn’t all that it was promised to be,” adds Tattersall. “Education has been crucial in helping producers understand how to integrate this program into their operations…No producer wants to receive a PRF loss because if they do it means its been dry! On the other hand when PRF losses have not funded 100% of their premium producers have experienced above average precipitation typically resulting in livestock gains…writing a PRF premium check isn’t’ a bad bet to lose!

Successful integration of PRF into a ranching operation also relies heavily on education and proper planning. AgRisk Advisors spend hours between software and customers to ensure coverage is placed correctly based on long-range weather and historical data. They can also track a policy for a customer for an entire year to help them get a feel for the program.

AgRisk Advisors’ Role and Expertise
AgRisk Advisors play a significant role in helping producers navigate the complexities of the PRF program. Having a local presence and production background offers customers a sense of comfort and trust.

“I’ve been working with AgRisk Advisors as an agent for six years,” Kravig shares. “And I’m proud to work with the company. We have a great team and excellent resources. (Many) are involved in production practices while serving as agents, which gives our customers a real sense of commonality.

Cattle producers can visit PRFadvisors.com to learn more about the insurance program and working with the AgRisk team.

By focusing on long-term success and integrating the PRF program into their operations with professional support, Tattersall and the AgRisk team are confident that producers can effectively manage their risks and achieve sustainable growth.

“We are very proud of who we serve and our customers, ranchers and farmers.”

For more resources such as weekly weather forecasts, long range forecasts, podcasts, and much more, visit AgRiskAdvisors.com or PRFAdvisors.com.

Skip to content