How Technology, Storage and Moisture Management Improve Forage Quality

How Technology, Storage and Moisture Management Improve Forage Quality

By Jaclyn Krymowski for American Cattlemen 

Hay remains a sizable feed expense for many beef operations. It may well be the single largest one if feeding a herd over the winter. Between skyrocketing fuel costs and drought conditions, the price of hay reflects the increase in input costs. 

Even when forage yields are strong, significant losses can occur between cutting and feeding. 

Research consistently shows that storage alone can result in dry matter losses ranging from less than 5% under ideal conditions to more than 30% in poorly managed outdoor storage systems, per the University of Wisconsin Extension. 

But with the right combination of baling technology, moisture management and proper storage practices, forage losses can be reduced significantly without sacrificing nutrient quality from harvest through feeding. 

Capturing Forage Quality 

forage’s nutrient quality is set. Unfortunately, it can only go down from there, and how much depends on when and how it’s harvested, handled and stored. 

The first big factor in forage quality hinges on timing of harvest. One of the most important factors affecting forage quality is the stage of maturity. Even with the best seeding, delayed harvest reduces protein and digestibility. 

There is simply no technology that can fully compensate for overmature forage. 

As far as equipment goes, there’s a lot to be said about working with what you’ve got and not sinking a fortune into something new just because it’s perceived as “better.” That said, there are a few details you should know about the nuances of working with older versus newer equipment. 

Balers 

The first consideration should be the relationship between your balers and hay harvesting. For example, per the Virginia Tech Extension bulletin Management Tips for Round Bale Hay Harvesting, Moving, and Storage, “Hay producers select large round balers over small rectangular balers because of their high capacity, lower cost and lower labor requirements. One person, with properly sized equipment, can usually bale, store and feed all the hay for most average size operations.” 

Authors Robert “Bobby” Grisso and John Fike make note that dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) losses tend to be greater with large round bales compared to small squares. For grass hays, this may not be as concerning as costly legume hays, which experience shatter loss. 

“Because of this potential loss, timely field operations are more critical with large round bales than with small rectangular bales,” they write. “Use equipment and management techniques specifically designed for large round bales, since baling, transport, storage and feeding losses of large round bales can be higher than with small rectangular bales.” 

While round bales dominate much of the beef industry due to labor savings and handling efficiency, small square bales still offer advantages in certain situations. Their denser packing and easier handling can reduce some storage and feeding losses, particularly for higher-value forages. Large square bales have also gained popularity on larger operations because they combine much of the efficiency of round bales with improved stacking, transportation and storage characteristics. 

Ultimately, the right choice depends on labor availability, storage capacity, feeding system and the value of the forage being harvested. 

Moisture Sensors 

One of the handiest devices in modern haymaking are real-time moisture readings on balers to reduce the guesswork. 

Baling at the proper moisture can be a balancing act. Hay that is slightly wetter can help preserve leaves and reduce shatter losses, especially in alfalfa and other legumes. However, excessive moisture creates risks ranging from mold development and heating to outright spoilage. Moisture sensors allow producers to make adjustments in real time rather than relying solely on feel, appearance or experience. 

GPS and Yield Monitoring

There are a variety of new yield monitoring tools, software programs and GPS systems to use the same way as precision planting or harvesting. But aside from the obvious, these tools are also ways to improve your management to improve current and future decisions before, during and after a cutting. 

Yield maps can help identify consistently productive and underperforming areas of a field, allowing producers to target fertility, drainage or renovation efforts where they are needed most. GPS-guided records can also help track harvest timing, field conditions and forage inventories across multiple cuttings. Over time, this information can reveal trends that improve both forage quality and overall efficiency. 

Storage Improvements Save Hay 

Many producers focus heavily on production while overlooking storage losses that quietly erode forage inventory throughout the year. 

One of the biggest safeguards storage offers is protecting hay against losses (dry matter, mold, nutrient) and weathering. 

According to a bulletin from Mississippi State, Hay Storage: Dry Matter Losses and Quality Changes, uncovered round bales stored directly on the ground may experience substantial losses depending on climate and management. It comes as no surprise that this option is, unfortunately, the cheapest as well. 

“Most storage losses occur where hay bales touch soil. Place round bales on gravel, pallets or tires to minimize dry matter losses but be aware that tires may hold water,” writes author Rocky Lemus, a plant and soil sciences professor. “Elevation is not necessary for bales covered in solid plastic because the plastic layer provides a barrier against moisture movement from the soil. Some studies have shown that these techniques reduce storage losses by 15%.” 

Gravel pads work as a decent alternative to direct ground storage as they do provide better drainage and less bottom moisture. However, they don’t offer the same air movement and minimal ground contact that pallets or other elevated surfaces do. 

For indoor storage, there are a variety of options that all work similarly as well. Even a tarp shelter, assuming that ground contact is minimal, can still significantly reduce weathering losses. 

Remember that even properly wrapped and secured bales will still need some degree of monitoring to make sure that there aren’t tears or other damages exposing oxygen. 

Moisture Management 

Whether producing dry hay or baleage, moisture remains one of the most important variables affecting forage quality and storage success. 

Moisture levels that are too high increase the risk of mold growth, excessive heating, protein damage, and even spontaneous combustion. Conversely, forage that becomes overly dry before baling is more susceptible to leaf shatter and harvest losses, particularly in legumes where many of the most valuable nutrients are concentrated in the leaves. 

Recommended moisture levels vary by forage system. Dry hay is generally baled at 14-18% moisture for small square bales, 12-16% for large round bales and 10-15% for large square bales. Baleage systems typically perform best between 40% and 60% moisture. 

Fortunately, producers have more tools than ever available for monitoring moisture. Handheld moisture testers remain a popular and affordable option for spot checks in the field. Inline baler sensors provide continuous readings throughout the baling process and can alert operators to changing conditions. As always, lab analysis remains the gold standard for accuracy when evaluating forage samples. 

Modern baling technologies allow producers to harvest forage more efficiently and within increasingly narrow weather windows. Improved storage systems can substantially reduce dry matter losses and protect feed value. Moisture management remains the common thread linking harvest success and storage performance. 

Putting It Together 

Investments in sensors, preservatives, storage improvements and monitoring systems should be evaluated not only by equipment cost but by the amount of forage quality preserved. 

In today’s cattle market, every bale represents a significant investment. Protecting that investment through better technology and management can improve both herd performance and overall operation profitability. 

 

Back to Home

Follow us on Facebook! American Cattlemen | Facebook

CERES TAG Expands Consultancy Network with MidWest Beef Cattle Consultants Partnership

CERES TAG Expands Consultancy Network with MidWest Beef Cattle Consultants Partnership

CERES TAG, the world’s first and most experienced provider of direct-to-satellite livestock monitoring, has continued to expand its consultancy network through a new agreement with MidWest Beef Cattle Consultants.

As global pressure mounts on producers to deliver livestock more profitably and sustainably, the role of data-driven decision-making has never been more critical. While many producers recognise the need to adopt technology to remain competitive, the challenge often lies in understanding how to effectively interpret and apply the insights generated.

CERES TAG is addressing this gap by building a strong community around producers, investing in trusted consultants who can guide adoption, build confidence, and ensure data is translated into meaningful, on-farm outcomes.

Through this initiative, producers who purchase and register 100 or more CERES GEN6 devices will receive complimentary time with an experienced consultant. This personalised support helps producers accelerate adoption, remove uncertainty, and unlock the full value of their data, improving productivity, optimising asset utilisation, reducing labour demands, and ultimately increasing profitability.

CERES GEN6 is the latest evolution in smart livestock monitoring. The solar-powered, direct-to-satellite device enables real-time tracking of animal location, behaviour, and wellbeing, without the need for additional infrastructure such as towers or receivers. Designed for extensive and remote operations, CERES GEN6 delivers continuous data on grazing patterns, activity levels, and animal performance, empowering producers to make timely, informed decisions that enhance animal welfare and operational efficiency.

The latest consultancy group to join this growing network is MidWest Beef Cattle Consultants.

Dr Mark West of MidWest Beef Cattle Consultants said, “Implementation of technology is no longer optional. Today’s production systems require deeper insights to optimise animal behaviour, genetics, and asset performance, delivering improved profitability, stronger animal welfare outcomes, and more resilient operations for producers.”

David Smith, CEO of CERES TAG, added, “While adoption of technology like CERES TAG is a choice, producers are increasingly competing against those who are already leveraging these insights. Access to accurate, real-time data is becoming a key differentiator in product integrity, operational efficiency, and long-term sustainability.”

Shane White, National Sales Manager at CERES TAG, commented, “We are seeing clear differences in profitability and performance between producers who embrace data-driven decision-making and those who resist change. The industry is evolving rapidly, and technology is playing a central role in how we sustainably meet the growing demand for food production.”

This partnership reinforces CERES TAG’s commitment to supporting producers beyond technology, providing the expertise, guidance, and confidence needed to navigate digital transformation and achieve measurable results on-farm.

About CERES TAG
CERES TAG is a global leader in direct-to-satellite livestock monitoring, delivering real-time insights that improve productivity, animal welfare, and sustainability for producers worldwide.

About MidWest Beef Cattle Consultants
MidWest Beef Cattle Consultants provides consulting services and support to beef producers, helping them navigate herd management and production challenges.

Building a Better Cattle Handling Setup

Building a Better Cattle Handling Setup

Working cattle is never just another chore on the list, it takes some serious time dedication, planning, and a little bit of cooperation from your cattle, or calves. Having the right cattle handling setup can make the difference between a smooth day and a stressful one. Some days it goes smooth, where cattle flow easy, gates swing right, and you finish before you know it. Other days, it feels like everything fights you, including mud on your boots, a stubborn cow at the gate, and it causes more stress than it should take.

Design Matters

Most ranchers will tell you that those long days usually trace back to the setup. When your facilities work with you and with the cattle, the job finishes safer and faster. Hi-Hog has been building and designing cattle handling equipment setups since its incorporation in 1974. We were able to speak with Myron Wigness from Hi-Hog Farm & Ranch Equipment about some tips and advice when it comes to designing your set-up. One of Wigness’s top recommendations when evaluating design is to choose something versatile that fits your specific operation. As he explains, “We try to develop a line that’s very versatile. There are very few situations that we even have to build special equipment to fit, even if it’s into a restricted area, like a vet clinic.” Having a versatile design will give you flexibility and functionality for future growth and needs.

MJE Livestock Equipment is designed and tested in demanding environments to withstand heavy, everyday use, which gives customers confidence in its durability and performance. In a previous American Cattlemen Podcast episode, we were able to sit down with Ethan Cantrell with MJE Livestock Equipment. He sheds some light on the importance of design. He states, “You want to make sure you’re working with the cattle flow. If they’re moving with you instead of you fighting them, there’s a lot less stress for everyone.” When they don’t, you feel it in your back, your time, and sometimes your bottom line. (To listen to the full podcast about MJE and design go to: https://americancattlemen.com/podcast/mje-livestock-equipment-cattle-con-2026/)

How that job goes often depends on the setup more than anything else. A well-designed handling system can turn a long, stressful day into a smooth and efficient one, while a poor system can lead to frustration, injury, and lost performance. Research from universities and animal behavior experts has shown that cattle handling setups are not just about equipment, but about how that equipment works with the natural behavior of the animal. When design and behavior align, both cattle and handlers benefit.

Another option to consider is if you need a portable model. Choosing where and how you’ll use your equipment is key, and for many operations, a portable setup offers the most flexibility. John McDonald developed the Rawhide Portable Corral after years of working with cattle and hauling rodeo arenas across the country. His goal was to create a system that was quick and easy to use in remote pastures. As he explains, “When I first invented the Rawhide, it was out of necessity,” says John McDonald. “I was doing somethings with livestock in isolated pastures and we were set up like most people—namely with portable panels. My initial objective was just to be able to set something up that was not labor involved or labor intensive and to catch whatever I needed to and go on with my day.”

Today, the Rawhide line includes multiple models. The Original serves as a basic catch-pen system with quick, low-labor setup and options sized for different herd numbers, while the more advanced Processor model adds features like a head gate, adjustable alley, and loading chute to handle a wider range of livestock needs.

Low-Stress Handling

Cattle remember fear, and Temple Grandin, is one of the industry’s most respected researcher when it comes to cattle and cattle handling equipment. Studies led by researchers like Temple Grandin at Colorado State University have shown that cattle respond strongly to fear and past experiences. Cattle that are handled roughly become more difficult to manage over time. Their research also shows that while cattle that are handled calmly tend to move more easily and show less stress.

This is not just about convenience; stress has real effects on profit. Research has found that highly stressed cattle can take 20 to 30 minutes for their heart rate to return to normal after agitation, and repeated stress can reduce weight gain, weaken immune response, and hurt reproduction. This means that equipment design should be to minimize stress and fear. Curved alleys, solid-sided chutes, and smooth transitions all help cattle move more naturally because they limit distractions and take advantage of herd behavior.

Closely tied to cattle behavior is the concept of low-stress handling. University and industry research has consistently shown that reducing stress improves both animal welfare and production outcomes. In one review of livestock handling systems, researchers noted that cattle exposed to lower stress return to feed more quickly and experience less sickness, which directly impacts profitability.

Equipment that supports low stress, such as properly sized alleys and well-designed crowding areas, makes it easier for handlers to apply these principles consistently.

Safety

Safety is another major factor that cannot be overlooked. Cattle are large animals, and even a calm animal can cause serious injury if the setup is not designed correctly. Research and extension programs have long emphasized the importance of escape routes, solid gates, and proper chute function. Poorly designed systems increase the likelihood of handler injury, especially in tight spaces or areas with poor visibility. The Center for Disease Control estimates that the average non-fatal ranch injury costs a little over $15,000 in medical expenses and lost time from work.

If you can limit the amount of time that you have to be in the pen with cattle, you can increase your safety. Ray Sturn, Moly Manufacturing Plant Manager, illustrates how Moly Manufacturing’s TurretGate helps minimize contact with cattle. He says, “The inspiration for came from Moly Manufacturing founder Jon Mollhagen’s childhood experience with traditional crowding gates, particularly the danger of gates kicking back on him and the intense pressure created when people are forced to work inside confined spaces with cattle. Gates have always been the number one hazard, and crowding animals in high-impact areas only increases risk for both people and livestock.”

He continues, “Even with hydraulic gates, the fundamental problem remained: operators still had to push gates into oncoming animals. The breakthrough came with the shuttle function, which allows the crowding gate to roll back through the turret. This design lets cattle move with the flow instead of forcing them against it, eliminating the need to push a gate into animals altogether.”

While working cattle, cattle can be unpredictable as their flight or fight instincts kick in. Sturn says, “Traditional systems also require people to stand inside the tub or alley, with cattle behind them. In that situation, the person becomes the prey – animals are trying to escape while being pressured from behind and driven toward the same alley. TurretGate changes this dynamic by allowing shorter alleys behind the crowding gate, reducing pressure, and creating calmer movement.”

As Ethan Cantrell with MJE Livestock Equipment says “A bunch of these operations we work with are family businesses. We want the whole family out there, we want everyone feeling safe.” At the core, safer facilities reduce accidents. A well-built chute that holds an animal securely not only protects the handler but also reduces stress on the animal by preventing excessive movement.

Just as you should consider your design and layout, you should consider your available labor and help. Operations with limited or no assistance need setups that reduce workload and prioritize safety for both the handler and the animals. As Myron Wigness with Hi-Hog notes, “During calving season, a lot of times, you’re stumbling around out there in the dark by yourself. So, safety is a big concern. We try to keep even someone that’s working alone safe.”

So, consider the safety of you, your help, and the stress on the cattle. Set your pens up so cattle want to walk through with minimal balking and distractions. It’s safest for you if you can minimize your direct contact with cattle.

Invest in Quality Equipment

Efficiency is another area where equipment design plays a key role. Studies on cattle flow have shown that animals move more easily through systems that are designed with their natural behavior in mind. Cattle prefer to follow one another and avoid sharp contrasts in light, shadows, or sudden changes in direction. When ignoring these factors, cattle tend to balk, bunch up, or turn back, which slows down the entire process. In contrast, systems with smooth flow can significantly reduce labor needs. Producers often report being able to work cattle with fewer people when facilities are properly designed, and this aligns with research showing that calm, steady movement reduces handling time and stress.

At the center of any handling system is the equipment itself, including chutes, headgates, alleys, and crowding areas. Each component plays a specific role, and research supports the idea that these parts must work together as a system. For example, a well-designed chute that applies even pressure can help calm cattle during restraint, which is why squeeze chutes are widely used. Observations and behavioral studies have shown that some cattle actually become calmer when held securely, as the pressure can reduce anxiety. At the same time, poorly designed equipment that causes pain or discomfort can create negative associations, making cattle harder to handle in the future.

Choosing your System

One of the most discussed topics in cattle handling today is the choice between a Bud box and a crowd tub. While there is a limit to formal research directly comparing the two, both systems are based on well-established behavioral principles. A crowd tub uses a circular design to guide cattle forward, while a Bud box relies on the animal’s instinct to return to where it came from. The success of either system depends heavily on proper use. Research on cattle perception and behavior shows that animals respond differently based on their previous experiences and how they interpret their environment. This means that even the best system can fail if it isn’t in use correctly, while a simpler system can work well in the hands of a skilled handler.

Another important consideration is whether to use portable or permanent equipment. The choice depends on operation size and management style. Portable systems offer flexibility and are useful for operations that handle cattle in multiple locations, while permanent systems allow for more precise design and often greater durability. The key is to match the system to the operation, ensuring that it supports efficient and low-stress handling.

Durability and material quality are also critical factors. Equipment that breaks or fails during handling can create dangerous situations and increase stress for both cattle and handlers. Investing in strong materials, solid welds, and proper coatings to prevent rust can extend the life of equipment and reduce long-term costs.

Upgrades are Investments

Cost is often one of the biggest concerns for producers, and it is important to look at equipment as an investment rather than just an expense.  Cantrell suggests producers look at upgrades as investments rather than unnecessary expenses. When it comes to upgrades, Cantrell explains, “It’s a big investment and something they’re going to use to keep their business going”.

Research has shown that stress and poor handling can negatively impact weight gain and meat quality, which directly affects profitability. When viewed in this context, higher-quality equipment that reduces stress and improves efficiency can provide a strong return over time. For example, calmer cattle are less likely to experience bruising and less weight-loss from stress. These losses can add up quickly, making it worthwhile to invest in better facilities.

Ray Sturns illustrates how upgrades can help with both animal and handler safety. He states, “Most conventional crowding systems are antiquated, relying on human presence inside the animals’ flight zone to function. Even standing outside a swinging gate still puts the operator in that flight zone, which creates unnecessary pressure and unpredictability.”

Use Modern Tech to Further Advance

Sturns goes on to highlight how upgrading your gates can keep handlers safe and reduce injury risk. He says,TurretGate replaces that inefficiency with a safer, more humane process. Operators receive training to stay out of the tub entirely and use a remote control instead. By avoiding the flight zone altogether, cattle move more naturally, reducing stress, virtually removing the need for people to be in with the animals. Our customers always tell us that adding the TurretGate to their current system reduced the physical exertion of two people while working cattle, and has also eliminated their labor needs by two people – that’s a big savings to any operation.”

Modern technology is also playing a growing role in cattle handling. Hydraulic chutes, electronic scales, and data tracking systems are becoming more common, especially in larger operations. They can improve efficiency and reduce physical strain on handlers, and also reduce the amount of labor needed to work cattle. Technology also allows producers to collect more data, which can be of use to make better management decisions over time.

Final Thoughts on Building Better Cattle Handling Setups

Finally, the overall layout of the facility is just as important as the cattle handling equipment setup itself. Research and extension recommendations consistently emphasize the importance of proper layout, including good drainage, thoughtful placement of pens and alleys, and consideration of environmental factors like wind and sunlight. Poor layout can create muddy conditions, increase stress, and slow down cattle movement, while a well-planned system can improve both efficiency and animal welfare.

In the end, safe cattle handling starts with handlers, and design. When it comes to cattle handling equipment, creating a system that works with the natural behavior of cattle, supports handler safety, and improves overall efficiency is key. Industry experts make it clear that low-stress handling has real, measurable benefits for animal health, performance, and profitability. By focusing on behavior, design, and long-term value, producers can build systems that make cattle work safer, smoother, and more productive for years to come.

June 2026

By Jessica Graham

Back to Home

Follow us on Facebook! American Cattlemen | Facebook