Non-Bloating Legumes

Non-bloating Legumes 

By Heather Smith Thomas 

Legumes are often important in cattle diets because they are generally higher quality, with more protein and other nutrients than some grasses.  The problem with one of the most common legumes grown for livestock feed—alfalfa—is the tendency to cause bloat, especially when grazed, and it can be quite risky under certain conditions.  A lot of research has been done on non-bloating legumes and on trying to develop alfalfa varieties that are less risky when grazed. 

Dr. Donald Miller has developed or co-developed 100 alfalfa varieties and 6 red clovers during his plant breeding career.  He grew up in Texas on a farm and went to New Mexico State University.  “I worked for alfalfa breeders in New Mexico and got my Masters and PhD while I was there.  I was hired as an alfalfa breeder for the western U.S. and moved to Idaho in 1984 after I finished college, heading up an alfalfa program and a research facility in Nampa, and one in California near Kingsburg. The company, AgriPro North American Plant Breeders, was owned by Shell Oil.  Then AgriPro became Cal West, and then Alforex.  I was director of product development for Alforex—the alfalfa division of Corteva,” he says. 

Cattle producers can graze alfalfa but you have to know how to do it.  One of my breeding programs was with so-called grazing-tolerant alfalfa, in conjunction with the University of Georgia.  They couldn’t put up alfalfa as hay in that climate because they have too much rain.  They wanted to use a legume and grazed the alfalfa rather than cut it as hay,” he says. 

There is a management guide on grazing alfalfa.  “The University of Kentucky just released a guide on that about a year ago.  Ray Smith, an Extension educator in Kentucky, was trained in Georgia.  I used to go to Argentina to look at their grazing-tolerant alfalfas, and they could successfully graze pure stands of alfalfa, but you have to know how.  When you put cattle out there, the first thing they do is eat all the leaves and then start eating the stems.  That creates a change in diet and can trigger bloat.  We found that if you move the fence daily, so they have a consistent diet, it helps prevent problems,” he says. 

“We really don’t have a non-bloating alfalfa, but we do know how to manage the cattle to reduce the risk.  In Argentina they were doing it on a large scale, and we do have grazing-tolerant alfalfa that can survive in spite of hoof damage and crown rot.  We developed lines that could survive those negative impacts, says Miller. 

“I have been acquiring some alfalfa varieties from New Mexico State University that were developed for drought tolerance.  If you can water the first two cuttings and then have to turn the water off during mid-summer, the alfalfa goes dormant from lack of water.  It looks like it is dead, but it can go several months without any irrigation at all.  It is resilient and will come back after you add water to it,” he says. 

Miller has also done some work with sainfoin, which is a non-bloating legume.  “When I was at New Mexico State University we released a new sainfoin variety.  Sainfoin has a big stem and lots of blooms and it’s a beautiful crop.  It has a problem with crown rot; if you graze it the animals are stepping on those plants and damaging the crowns,” he says. 

The best results I’ve ever seen was when they planted the sainfoin up on beds, and when they turned the cattle out they walked in the furrows and not on the plants.  On those beds there was also a little less water if you had a high water table or too much water out on the field, and this made for less disease in those plants.   

Sainfoin is non-bloating and will out-produce alfalfa on the first cut but in mid-summer it starts slowing down.  Some people are using it in Montana and Wyoming; the University of Montana released a new variety about 20 years ago and there have been some other new ones developed in Canada.  It is a good non-bloating legume, and if there are any bees in the area they come to those flowers.  The field is alive with bees!”   It makes good honey! 

Earl Creech (Professor and Extension Agronomist at Utah State University) has done some trials with birdsfoot trefoil, sainfoin and cicer milkvetch.  Birdsfoot trefoil grows really well in the intermountain West and does best in the hottest time of the year.  Alfalfa grows better in the early and later part of the growing season but birdsfoot trefoil loves the heat.  It doesn’t get very tall so it doesn’t do as well for haying, but it grows well in pastures,” he says. 

“I think the key to birdsfoot trefoil is letting it go to seed.  In our environment here in Northern Utah, you have to let it flower and not graze it during September-October until it can reseed itself.  That’s how you get persistent stands.  One of the complaints about birdsfoot trefoil is that the stands don’t last long but that’s only because people are grazing it too heavily late in the year and not allowing it to go to seed.” 

Cicer milkvetch has the drawback of being very slow to establish.  It usually takes two years to get it going, but once it is established it is very productive and grows very well—and grazing livestock really like it. 

Sainfoin and cicer milkvetch don’t require quite as much water as some of the other forage crops.  “They usually need some irrigation or rainfall during summer but they have more drought tolerance than birdsfoot trefoil that needs full irrigation or some rainfall throughout the growing season,” says Creech. 

We’ve done quite a bit of work with these legumes in mixtures and published some of those results.  Several people with USDA were also involved with some of those publications.  Basically, when you grow a 50-50 mix of grass and non-bloating legumes or grass with alfalfa you can actually get as much forage production as you would get by applying nitrogen fertilizer to a pure grass stand.  In a year like this, where nitrogen fertilizer is very expensive, you can save that expense if it’s a mix—and still get excellent forage production.  The legume supplies the necessary nitrogen,” he says. 

Matt Yost, Extension Specialist at Utah State University, has also done some research on non-bloating legumes.  One trial he worked on was trying to inter-seed sainfoin with alfalfa and grow them together as a way to try to reduce bloat.  “We seeded them together and measured production for three years.  We found extra production and a little bit of reduction in condensed tannins, which is one of the primary measures we look at for bloat risk,” he says. 

“We saw that when we had sainfoin in the stand, that first year we saw some reduction in potential for bloat, but it didn’t persist over the three years, mainly because sainfoin could not compete well with the alfalfa.  By year three we had a few sainfoin plants left but they’d become sparse in the stand; they didn’t last,” says Yost.  “I don’t know if that system would work very well, planting them together, but sainfoin by itself can be a good forage for reducing bloat.” 

This non-bloating legume has had a lot of study for livestock forage.  Grant Lastiwka (originally a Forage/Livestock Business Specialist with Alberta Agriculture and now with Union Forage), has been studying various forages in grazing systems for a long time.  “Eleven years ago we started working with a new sainfoin variety and asked producers grazing higher-legume pastures to keep their beef and pasture financial records. We also worked with several Applied Research and Forage Associations in seeding sainfoin-alfalfa mixtures in small plot trials,” he says. 

 After 3 years of data collection from these plots and producer data from regular and higher-legume mix pastures, the outcomes were favorable; most higher-legume pastures were significantly more productive and profitable than just grass pastures.  “Several producers wanted to be part of the next step of this research; we had 12 sites (about 10 acres each) seeded in Alberta and one in British Columbia—with a mix of sainfoin, alfalfa and grasses,” says Lastiwka. 

“We looked at new sainfoin cultivars and the different varieties’ ability to regrow, compared with alfalfa.  Because sainfoin can set seed so easily, it has the ability to create a soil seedbank.  There is opportunity for regeneration from seed,” he says.  If a producer lets sainfoin go to seed now and then, there is less need to reseed a pasture.   

The main problem with sainfoin is its large seed, almost seven times larger than alfalfa seed.  “It has only about 30,000 seeds per pound versus 200,000 seeds per pound with alfalfa.  When buying seed, wanting sainfoin to be a large part of a total mix, most producers balk at paying that much money for seed,” says Lastiwka. 

“The seed industry puts percent of total seed weight of each component of a mixture on the bag label.  If the label says 50% sainfoin, because of sainfoin’s large seed size, this translates into only about 20% of a stand would be sainfoin because those seeds are so large,” he explains. 

If allowed to reseed itself, however, sainfoin will easily maintain or even increase in a stand of hay or pasture–if given long enough recovery to go to seed.  “If regrowth is grazed, the grazing activity of cattle consuming and defecating viable seed can spread the seeds (or trample them into the soil) as another planting,” says Lastiwka. On his own farm he’s established sainfoin by feeding it to cattle in mineral mixes.  The seed is still viable after going through the rumen. 

Andrea Hanson, former Beef Extension Specialist (Alberta Agriculture and Forestry) and now with Lakeland College, was part of that project and worked with producers across Alberta.  “The first year we established sainfoin as part of a high-legume pasture mix at 12 sites, and the second year those sites were grazed.  Some producer cooperators had very good establishment the first year, while others did not—either because of two much or too little moisture, weeds, or other reasons,” she says. 

“Grazing the 2nd year provided a variety of outcomes.  Producers with forage establishment from the 1st year were able to graze effectively.  Sainfoin reduces risk for bloat, even in pastures that also have alfalfa, because sainfoin contains tannins that bind excess plant protein.  The tannins precipitate these excess proteins out of the rumen fluid, preventing creation of stable foam that forms in pasture bloat,” explains Hanson.   

Many producers have had bad experiences with alfalfa and bloat but with sainfoin added to a pasture this risk is reduced.  Grazing research has shown up to 98% reduction in bloat when sainfoin makes up at least 25% of a sainfoin/alfalfa stand. 

“With weather unpredictability, having a diversified stand allows different plants to thrive in different conditions; we get more drought resistance.  Legumes have a deep tap root and can penetrate deeper into the soil where there is more moisture.  Poor-producing pastures with few or no legumes have risk of depletion earlier in the grazing season.”  Without legumes you may have less pasture and less quality forage for cattle. 

“The sainfoin we used for this project has a growth pattern like alfalfa and can withstand grazing better than previous varieties.  A concern with sainfoin in the past is that it would be grazed out too quickly and then the risk for bloat is back again with the alfalfa that remains,” she explains.  This new variety of sainfoin is better for grazing. 

“Our focus in this project was to have 60% or more legumes and 40% other forage species.  Cooperating producers chose whatever else they wanted to put with the legumes–grasses or more legumes like birdsfoot trefoil or alfalfa,” she says.  

 “From grazing experience, one of the most notable observations was importance of seed set for longevity of high-legume forage stands–the need for some recovery time and regrowth—for natural reseeding.  The 2017 growing season was really dry in parts of Alberta until fall.  One site was left un-grazed by the producer until fall, so there was seed set and germination. We have to remember when grazing it, to leave some, so the plants can produce seed,” she says. 

Dr. Surendra Bhattarai, Assistant Professor, Forage Agronomy, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, was doing research with sainfoin in Canada before taking his current position at the University of Wyoming in January, 2025, and has started some new trials.  In one of his projects he included many kinds of forage legumes to compare their various benefits and drawbacks. 

“I included sainfoincicer milkvetch, birdsfoot trefoil and alfalfa, looking at their production and their adaptability in our environment.  Some of these things have already been studied but I want to look at different varieties. I am hopeful that we will have many different varieties of forage legumes established in Wyoming,” he says. 

“I started with non-bloating legumes, such as sainfoincicer milkvetch, birdsfoot trefoil, comparing their yield with traditional alfalfa.  Those non-bloating legumes have beneficial nutritive values, but their yield is not up to the mark that alfalfa growers are getting.  We have the big challenge of harnessing their nutritive values while improving their yield and competitiveness with traditional alfalfa,” says Bhattarai. 

Alfalfa varieties have become very advanced, with many different high-yielding and high-quality varieties now available, but there are very few forage scientists working on non-bloating legumes.  “With my experience on non-bloating legumes I am interested in taking the sainfoin research forward.  My project is in Wyoming but my main object is to provide a sustainable and alternative solution on producing legumes in areas where alfalfa production is limited,” he says.

Alfalfa production is challenged by the alfalfa weevil, which is a problematic pest for alfalfa growers.  “Some of the literature from earlier research suggests that sainfoin is resistant to the alfalfa weevil.  I want to look into the different agronomic aspects of sainfoin, and the adaptability of this and other non-bloating legumes so we could provide substitutes in regions where alfalfa productivity has been challenged.”  Producers could use sainfoin and not compromise the quality of the forage. 

He is not completely confident that sainfoin will be a future solution unless there can be support from producers and government for more research in sainfoin breeding.  “If we can get enough support, there is a lot we can achieve.  Sainfoin could be a very good alternative,” says Bhattarai. 

“In addition to the non-bloating benefits of sainfoin, it has high palatability, anthelmintic benefits and reduced methane emission.  Traditionally, the main challenge is lower yield and lower stand persistence, compared to alfalfa; it doesn’t have the swift regrowth.”  Producers can’t get as many cuttings during a long growing season, compared to alfalfa that can produce 3 or more cuttings. 

“This is why sainfoin has not gotten much attention in our climate and region in Wyoming, but if you go farther north, such as Montana and the Dakotas where you might only get two cuttings of alfalfa, this is a different situation.  I spent a lot of my time in Canada and we had a one or two-cut system, even for alfalfa, and sainfoin is a good fit there.  If forage scientists can improve the yield, regrowth and persistence of sainfoin, it would become highly valuable to more producers,” he says. 

He did his MS and PhD work at the University of Saskatchewan on sainfoin and alfalfa, where he learned a lot about forage breeding and has been working with sainfoin for several years.  One of my collaborative research projects with my mentor Dr. Bill Biligetu from the University of Saskatchewan, Canada focused on reducing the cost of sainfoin cultivation.  Sainfoin seed is very large, compared to alfalfa seed.  Forage seed producers are reluctant to use sainfoin because the seed size is so big and it costs more for seed than it does for alfalfa seed.  One of my research projects in Canada was looking to see if there is any way we can reduce the seed size so it would be lower cost for seed producers, so they could more easily incorporate sainfoin in their cultivation programs,” says Bhattarai. 

 

Back to Home

Follow us on Facebook! American Cattlemen | Facebook

Purina Animal Nutrition Unveils Second Edition of the Beef-on-Dairy Industry Report

Purina Animal Nutrition Unveils Second Edition of the Beef-on-Dairy Industry Report

Industry-leading experts provide valuable insights for stakeholders in the beef-on-dairy sector

ARDEN HILLS, Minn. (August 20, 2025) — Purina Animal Nutrition has unveiled the second edition of its Beef-on-Dairy Industry Report, offering producers an in-depth look at the evolving role of beef-on-dairy cattle in the U.S. beef supply chain.

The updated report features the latest data, market analysis and research-backed practices for improving beef-on-dairy outcomes from genetics and nutrition to on-farm management and marketing strategies.

Contributors include leading experts Patrick Linnell, CattleFax; Dr. Ruth Woiwode, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Dr. Michael Steele, University of Guelph; Dr. Ty Lawrence, West Texas A&M University; Dr. Daniel Thomson, Production Animal Consultation, LLC; Bruce Cobb, Certified Angus Beef; and industry consultant Nevil Speer, alongside Purina Animal Nutrition and Land O’Lakes experts Dr. Tom Earleywine and Laurence Williams.

“Beef-on-dairy cattle now account for 12-15% of fed cattle slaughter, creating a steady source of quality beef at a time when native beef numbers are tight,” says Laurence Williams, beef-on-dairy development for Purina Animal Nutrition. “With intentional genetics, nutrition and management, this group of cattle can deliver consistent quality to consumers while adding lasting value throughout the supply chain.”

The Beef-on-Dairy Industry Report can be downloaded at purinamills.com/dairy-beef.

For additional details or inquiries about the report, please reach out to Ellen Butterfield at ebutterfield@curiousplot.agency.

For more cattle info go to:

Home – American Cattlemen

For more dairy info go here:

Home – American Dairymen

If you also enjoy the Outdoors, the Iowa Sportsman is below:

Home – The Iowa Sportsman

The Need for Feed Supplements

The Need for Feed Supplements

Though the need for supplemental minerals has long been understood, it historically has been relegated to the meteorological fall through winter season when good grass forage isn’t available. As grass comes up in the spring, producers begin pulling cattle off mineral supplements. But as Brad Thornberg, the President of SweetPro explains, this conventional practice is now undergoing a reevaluation.

“Producers are becoming increasingly aware of the beneficial impact year-round mineral supplementation has for improving cattle health and breeding performance,” Thornberg says. “Supplements help fill in gaps where important minerals are missing, even in good forage. This plays an important part in improving breedback/preg rates and supporting the calf in reaching its full genetic performance potential.”

Of course, not all mineral supplements perform the same. There is a significant difference in types of mineral, delivery systems and bio-availability to the animal.

SweetPro Feeds

SweetPro Feeds has a range of bio-available vitamin and mineral supplements that match the condition of forages consumed. As Thornberg explains, they are designed to support cleaning and breedback while improving forage-feed efficiency, energy, gain and overall herd health. SweetPro also offers products for backgrounding and feedlot operations. SweetPro minerals are available in solid no-molasses, DDGS-based blocks and the loose form MINEX. The blocks are built for even delivery to the entire herd as boss cattle do not “camp” on the products. All SweetPro supplements come with high omega3 and the postbiotic and multi-prebiotic yeast culture, ProBiotein® to support rumen health.

Ruma-Lic Products

Tim Starbuck, membership manager at Ruma-Lic Animal Products & Ruma-Lic Farms, adds that over the years, the supplements and mineral industry has evolved from simply addressing basic nutritional needs to offering highly specialized solutions.

“Initially, the focus was on broad-spectrum supplements, but now we’re seeing a shift toward precision nutrition. Supplements and minerals are crucial for maintaining optimal cattle health and productivity. They help address specific nutritional gaps that can affect growth, reproduction and immune function. Investing in the right products is essential because it ensures that cattle get balanced nutrition, which translates to improved feed efficiency and better overall performance,” Starbuck says. “From my perspective, this investment pays off by enhancing herd health and boosting productivity, ultimately leading to greater profitability for producers. It’s about making informed choices that support the long-term success of their operations.”

At Ruma-Lic Liquid Feed Liquid Feed and Ruma-Zyme Probiotics +, they’ve pioneered this shift by developing targeted formulations of proteins, fats and advanced enzyme technologies. As Starbuck explains, these innovations allow them to tailor supplements to the specific needs of each herd, enhancing feed efficiency and overall cattle health. This evolution reflects a broader trend towards personalized nutrition, which helps cattlemen achieve better performance and productivity.

Specifically, Ruma-Lic Liquid Feed specializes in advanced feed formulations that are customized to support specific herd requirements, enhancing both health and performance. Meanwhile, Ruma-Zyme Probiotics + provides eight beneficial species of bacteria and cutting-edge enzyme products that improve digestion and nutrient absorption.

“Our program is designed to help ranchers achieve optimal feed utilization, better growth rates, and enhanced reproductive success,” Starbuck says. “Our products are the result of rigorous research and are tailored to provide the best possible outcomes for each unique herd.”

NEMO Feed

According to Matt Luebbe, as a representative of NEMO Feed, many of the advances made in the supplement and mineral industry have evolved because of a better understanding of nutrient requirements.

“Public and private research has identified the need for supplementing nutrients based on the rations fed or region cattle are located,” Luebbe says. “By determining the gaps or missing nutrients in a specific ration we can now customize supplements or mineral packages for an individual farm or ranch based on the resources they have for a base ration.” Luebbe adds that technology used by feed manufacturers has improved the efficiency of production to build custom feeds for producers.

“Hand-calculations and phone calls were replaced by improved means of communication and feed balancing programs to expedite the process,” Luebbe says. “This technology is very useful but only as good as our understanding of the fundamental requirements and principles of nutrition. Computer programs do not understand biology, so the nutritionist needs to use the program along with experience.”

NEMO Feed is an independent, full-service feed manufacturer that provides nutrition and feed services to the Midwest. The company offers a full line of non-GMO multi-species feed, with the commitment to provide products and programs that promote more profitability to your operations. Products that manipulate nutrient use in the animal are rigorously evaluated prior to release into the marketplace. These value-added products are offered by NEMO using a state-of-the-art micro nutrient machine system to assist with specific supplement formulation.

Exploring Latest Advancements

The traditional way of feeding supplements has been with molasses as a mineral carrier/binder. However, the understanding of gut health has led to supplementation that does not contain simple sugars from molasses, but are rather designed to support rumen bacteria with complex carbohydrates and prebiotic fiber.

“The addition of yeast cultures has boosted cattle immune systems,” Thornberg says. “MOS and ß-glucan from the yeast cell wall help remove pathogens, while other prebiotic fibers from the yeast growth media support important rumen and lower-gut bacteria. In another development, support for weaning, heat and transportation stress has led to the use of natural anti-stress blend additives in supplements. Garlic too has found a place in the fight against flies, ticks and lice alongside feed-through IGR.”

One of the exciting advancements Starbuck is seeing is the development of precision probiotics and enzyme products with enhanced efficacy. For instance, Ruma-Lic Liquid Feed has introduced new probiotic formulations designed to optimize gut health and nutrient absorption specifically within the small intestines. Additionally, Ruma-Zyme Probiotics + has launched innovative enzyme products that significantly improve the breakdown of complex feed components, enhancing digestibility and overall nutrient uptake.

“We’re also utilizing data analytics to fine-tune these formulations based on real-time herd health data. These advancements are helping ranchers achieve unprecedented levels of productivity and efficiency in their operations,” Starbuck says.

Identifying the Ideal Solution

So, how can producers determine the best supplement and minerals that are ideal for their herds? Thornberg says forage sampling is a good indication of the current condition of pastures and what nutrients and minerals are needed. There are many factors that the producer needs to take into account.

“Chiefly, are they getting their money’s worth? Is the mineral available to the body and will it meet that animal’s needs in their current forage conditions?,” Thornberg says. “Cattle age is also a factor, as young developing calves and heifers will need a more accessible product than mature cattle.”

For Starbuck, determining the best supplements and minerals involves a comprehensive approach. He says producers should start with a thorough nutritional assessment, which includes analyzing forage quality and feed composition. Working with a livestock nutritionist can also provide valuable insights into specific needs.

“Additionally, using diagnostic tools and monitoring herd performance can highlight areas where supplementation is needed. By combining these methods, producers can select products that precisely match their herd’s nutritional requirements, leading to improved health and productivity,” Starbuck says.

Inputs and Returns

Luebbe points out that the cost of production or the return on investment for producers is a very tight margin and constantly evaluated. Well managed operations look at many of the costs associated with supplementation on a cents per hd/day basis in addition to their return on investment.

“For crop production, farmers are using GPS to apply fertilizer or other products based on requirements for each row, or even a portion of the row,” Luebbe says. “We do not have the ability to individually feed each animal based on their specific requirements but still can tailor what is fed to each pen for most animals and remain profitable. The ‘one-size fits all’ mentality was used far too often for beef production in the past.’”

Continuous Improvements

The future of mineral supplementation is evolving towards use throughout the year, not just the fall and winter months. According to Thornberg, supplement products will target cattle gut health, the microbiome of the rumen and the lower gut tract, to support the reduction of antibiotic use.

“While the initial costs of year-round supplementation are higher, the boost in animal performance in all areas, from feed efficiency to fertility creates a greater return for the producer,” Thornberg says. “Nutrients from stools worked into the soil by dung beetles will increasingly improve the fertility of the pastures. The land is then benefited from enhanced feed efficiency. All stakeholders, producers, land managers and consumers benefit from these advancements in cattle health.”

Starbuck is optimistic about the future of supplements and minerals in the cattle industry. He says the industry is on the threshold of even more personalized and data-driven solutions that will revolutionize how we approach cattle nutrition.

“I foresee genetic advancement and data analytics leading to even more precise supplement formulations that enhance feed efficiency and overall health,” Starbuck says. “Furthermore, there’s a growing emphasis on sustainability, which will drive the development of environmentally friendly products. Overall, these innovations will significantly boost productivity, improve digestion, and support the long-term health and success of cattle operations.”

October 2024

By Maura Keller

Home – American Cattlemen

Looking for something different to read, check out this fly article

Keeping Flies At Bay

Here is the Dairy Side of things

Home – American Dairymen

Or if you enjoy the Outdoors, that could be hunting, fishing, or just recreational outdoor activities the Iowa Sportsman is a great option

Home – Iowa Sportsman