Change Modes With Your Next Grazing Plan

Change Modes With Your Next Grazing Plan

Most ranchers carry a good grazing plan in their heads, executing with a combination of intuition built on experience, an understanding of regional trends and an adaptivity to circumstances. But if you need to solve a significant problem or are ready to take aim at a new ideal like regenerative or adaptive grazing, it’s time put a proactive grazing plan on paper, Noble Research Institute Regenerative Ranching Advisor Steve Swaffar says.

“There is a heavier commitment to reach a goal you’ve written down,” he says. Writing a grazing plan on paper can feel uncomfortable, but “frankly, a good goal should make you nervous.”

For a more experienced rancher, building an ambitious grazing plan may be the slight push you need to make progress in the year ahead. For a beginning rancher or someone grazing a new piece of land, it’s an offensive plan to help navigate the unknown.

Either way, Swaffar says, “When you start putting the plan to paper, it opens all these ‘ah-ha’ moments.”

1. Start with your goals in mind

Every good grazing plan begins with a specific goal or goals.

If you worry every year about buying an unsustainable amount of hay, spend too much money on external inputs, or see an invasive species reducing your forage production, Swaffar says it’s time to meet the problem head-on by starting with a grazing goal and plan.

“These are the questions that have to stop us and make us ask, ‘How am I going to get through this?’” Swaffar says. “Well, I’ve got to sit down and make a plan, set some goals to solve the problem.” Along the way, you may uncover new opportunities as well.

Are you prepared to take advantage of an exceptionally favorable year with additional forage? Can you diversify your income with a new class or species of livestock? Could aligning your animals’ production cycle to match their environment reduce your labor requirements? What would your bottom line look like if you could sustainably produce X pounds of beef per acre?

Be realistic with these goals, Swaffar says, but remember that many good opportunities are missed due to a lack of preparation.

Finally, consider goals that will help shift your focus to create the business and life you want, Swaffar says. “Part of these goals could be, ‘My family wants to take a vacation in July.’ So where do my animals need to be to make it possible for us to be away? Build a plan from there.”

2. Take stock of where you’ll start

Once you set your goal(s), record a basic inventory of resources. You no doubt know your water sources and have a good idea of their quality and quantity, but writing it down may help address nagging, predictable problems (the well that comes up dry half the time, or the windmill that needs to be fixed every year).

“This inventory is where you can start to ask, ‘Where can I manage animals so that they’re most efficient, not walking over a mile to get to water? What opportunities do I have to create more paddocks and use this grass more efficiently?’” Swaffar says.

Next, evaluate your forage availability for the season ahead.

“If you’re a ‘trust your gut’ kind of guy, it’s still important to spot-check yourself from time to time,” Swaffar says. Use a forage stick or a clip-and- weigh method in multiple pasture locations to accurately assess your forage production.

Then, fill in dates critical to your business and the goal in mind. Calculate nutritional needs for breeding season, facility needs for calving, strengths and weaknesses in the resource inventory you have, and any other infrastructure that needs attention.

3. Plan the work, then work the plan

Once you have the critical information committed to black and white, you probably have some set dates and movements in mind or a paddock configuration that’s worked in the past. Swaffar suggests challenging your own assumptions.

If you’ve grazed one pasture from May 1 to June 15 for the past decade, try moving it to July. If you always set your paddocks up in long, skinny rectangles, try one fat square or triangles this year. Consider grazing a piece for a shorter or longer duration than you’ve ever grazed it before. Nature needs diversity to thrive, but without an intentional plan, human nature tends to fall back on ‘whatever I did last year.’

Swaffar advises making any major changes in a ‘safe-to-learn’ environment. Start small enough that if it goes wrong, it won’t be a crisis or create critical damage to land, livestock or livelihood.

“Consider making these changes in smaller, controlled areas, then observe, how did the animals and the plants react to that change? Did it get me closer to my goals?” Then, jot down some notes to establish a performance baseline.

“Some people are really numbers-driven, so they might want to see results in a soil test or see exactly how their stocking rates have changed in relation to weather patterns,” Swaffar says. “Other people monitor success by what they see – how many species of plants do I have here? How many species of invertebrates and vertebrates do I see? How are my animals behaving here? Others have 30 years of training their eye to their land, and they know from experience that they can make an accurate assessment of their land’s health.”

Take your Own Notes

Whichever category you’re in, take a moment to write down those markers and observations. Even if you don’t think you need to write it down, future generations or land managers will be grateful to inherit the historic knowledge, and you’ll be able to compare season to season and find concrete reasons to celebrate your success.

Your grazing plan may be charted in bar graphs or handwritten in bullet points. Others may use a map of proposed grazing paddocks with key dates and goals written in. Tech-driven ranchers might have an app they use or simply store the plan in their phone’s ‘notes’ feature. What matters is what gets recorded, Swaffar says.

4. Adapt to the unexpected; monitor and measure

The plan might not play out exactly as you wrote it –it’s likely not to – but the point is to increase situational awareness by identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats so you are prepared to make thoughtful decisions in an often unpredictable business.

As the grazing season progresses, check in and adjust accordingly on a weekly, or at least bi-weekly, basis. Evaluate the state of your forage in response to actual growing conditions.

Note how the animals respond to the actions in your grazing plan and to changes to their historic grazing patterns. As Noble Ranches moved to intense rotations with more frequent livestock moves, ranch staff expressed an understandable concern for animal performance.

“There were some animals that had to be transitioned off the place – they just didn’t handle the frequent moves. That elimination was just part of the process,” Swaffar said. “But when we look at the animals that held up, our ranch staff have been quite impressed. Our fly loads are less, they’re not walking long distance to water, so they don’t seek shade as often. Watching that animal behavior is a big way to monitor the success of your grazing plan.”

Summary

For most, the ultimate measure of a grazing plan’s success will be found in their bottom line. Each of these measurements – the soil, the forage, the animals, and your lifestyle. These culminate to ask the final questions: Am I spending less to produce the same? Are these decisions resulting in sustainable profitability?

These questions can’t often be answered in one grazing season or one year. Another reason to record goals at the start and your progress or challenges along the way.

“This grazing plan is a part of a bigger business plan, and we can’t be successful in the management of the land or the animals if we don’t treat it as a business,” Swaffar says.

By Laura Nelson

Click here for more information: https://americancattlemen.com/

Also check out the Dairy side

Home – American Dairymen

If you Enjoy the Outdoors

Home – The Iowa Sportsman

Loy: Ag Operations Continue to Strain Under Borrowing Costs

Loy: Ag Operations Continue to Strain Under Borrowing Costs

“The steady rate decision means financial strain may persist for producers with debt-heavy operations, and financial relief may take longer than expected.” — Ryan Loy

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Debt-heavy farm operations will continue to feel the burden of borrowing costs as the Federal Reserve said it would leave interest rates holding at 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent and persist in its quest to reduce inflation to 2 percent.

“For the agricultural industry, farmers who rely on financing to fund their enterprises will continue to face high borrowing costs,” said Ryan Loy, extension economist for the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture. “The steady rate decision means financial strain may persist for producers with debt-heavy operations, and financial relief may take longer than expected when the Federal Open Market Committee made its first rate cut in September 2024.”

Loy said that “by keeping rates steady, the Fed maintains the pressure to curb inflation without restricting growth.”

The Federal Open Market Committee’s statement was guardedly optimistic, while recognizing economic uncertainty.

“Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace,” the committee said. “The unemployment rate has stabilized at a low level in recent months, and labor market conditions remain solid. Inflation remains somewhat elevated.”

Expansion, inflation and uncertainty

Loy said that consumer spending and labor market conditions have been the main drivers of the economic expansion.

“The strong job market, with unemployment at around 4.1 percent as of December 2024 and rising wages are expected to continue to support this growth,” he said. However, “geopolitical tensions and tariffs could throw this trajectory off track.”

As for inflation, Loy said that “elevated vehicle and housing prices, due to a shortage of houses, were the main drivers of the increase as of the last Personal Consumption Expenditures report in November 2024.”

Why 2 percent?

The 2 percent goal was adopted in 2012, he said, adding that “the FOMC chooses the 2 percent because it balances price stability and economic growth. The 2 percent target is a compromise between these two ideas: It’s a high enough measure to avoid deflation, low enough to prevent the runaway inflation seen during the 1970s and gives the FOMC some ‘wiggle room’ to adjust monetary policy without severe economic disruptions.”

Fed Chair Jerome Powell said, “We remain committed to supporting maximum employment, bringing inflation sustainably to our 2 percent goal, and keeping longer-run inflation expectations well anchored.

“Over the course of our three previous meetings, we lowered our policy rate by a full percentage point from its peak,” Powell said. “That recalibration of our policy stance was appropriate in light of the progress on inflation and the rebalancing in the labor market.

“With our policy stance significantly less restrictive than it had been, and the economy remaining strong, we do not need to be in a hurry to adjust our policy stance,” he said. “At today’s meeting, the committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 4.25 to 4.5 percent.”

Fed to review its monetary policy

Powell also noted that the committee was undertaking a five-year review of its monetary policy, which will include public events around the country and a research conference in May to hear feedback.

“We intend to wrap up the review by late summer,” he said. “I would note that the committee’s 2 percent longer-run inflation goal will be retained and will not be a focus of the review.”

To learn about extension programs in Arkansas, contact your local Cooperative Extension Service agent or visit www.uaex.uada.edu. Follow us on X and Instagram at @AR_Extension. To learn more about Division of Agriculture research, visit the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station website: https://aaes.uada.edu. Follow on X at @ArkAgResearch. To learn more about the Division of Agriculture, visit https://uada.edu/. Follow us on X at @AgInArk.

About the Division of Agriculture

The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture’s mission is to strengthen agriculture, communities, and families by connecting trusted research to the adoption of best practices. Through the Agricultural Experiment Station and the Cooperative Extension Service, the Division of Agriculture conducts research and extension work within the nation’s historic land grant education system.

The Division of Agriculture is one of 20 entities within the University of Arkansas System. It has offices in all 75 counties in Arkansas and faculty on three campuses.

The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs to all eligible persons without regard to race, color, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, or any other legally protected status, and is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.

Media contact: Mary Hightower
mhightower@uada.edu

For More Cattlemen’s Information check here

Home – American Cattlemen

 

Is Regenerative Agriculture the Future

Regenerative Agriculture: The Future For Modern Food Production?

Amid all the hustle and bustle of daily modern agricultural practices and the drive to feed our rapidly growing world population, a small but growing community of food producers across the globe are pioneering a strategy of sustainable agriculture that could become a widespread practice in decades to come. Historical advancements in agriculture have almost always relied on improved outputs from greater and more precise inputs into farming systems. Many people now believe that pushing our livestock and crops to their genetic maximum is not sustainable in the long-run, and that the real answer to feeding the world may in-fact lie in focusing on longer term sustainability, even if that results in a decrease in output in the short term.

“The simplest answers are often the best,” says Kevin Kennedy, an Irish agri-business owner of who is pioneering a novel ‘high-health’ butter called ‘Anu Butter’ across Europe. Kennedy believes that the answer to world hunger lies in the soil, and that by focusing on soil health as the basis for agriculture, we can not only improve the reliability of food production, but also help mitigate greenhouse emissions. His dairy products come from farms that can prove their regenerative abilities, such as improving soil organic matter. “There is a great chasm in science when it comes to soil health; we know little about soil microbiomes and soil health, even though it’s been under our feet the whole time! I don’t think we need Elon Musk to get us to Mars as a way of saving the world, we have the resources under our feet.”

The regenerative agriculture community believes that the focus on output from the best soil regions of the world such as the American Cornbelt and the Paris Basin in France has depleted these natural soil resources and they now require huge amounts of chemical inputs to maintain production standards. The remedy to this problem may lie in going back to our roots, so to speak, and introducing large swaths of grassland and native prairie grasses back to depleted and poor soil areas of the world. The benefits of grassland as a means of improving soil health and therefore out-put have been proven many times and are slowly gaining popularity among producers around the world.

One community that is to the forefront of promoting grassland and soil sustainability is the Savory Institute, founded by Allan Savory. Savory’s work focuses on mimicking the behavior of large herds of ruminants that grazed natural grasslands in the era before intensive agriculture. Through rotational grazing with high stocking rates, the Savory Institute has had massive success in restoring dessertified and low-output soils into health, productive pastureland. Grazing poor soils with high intensity stocking rates and then allowing pastures adequate recovery time will result in increased forage production over time, increases in soil carbon levels, increase in water holding capacity and overall profitability.

But the benefits of regenerative agriculture are not something to limit to arid soils and dust-bowl type fields. Many American beef ranchers who have applied rotational grazing to their ranches will be able to relate to the regenerative community claims of improvements in forage output, stocking rate carrying capacity and overall profitability in their business. ‘Regenerative agriculture’ may sound ‘hippy’ to modern day industrialist farmers.

It may even bring up connotations of low-output, low profit farming. But in reality, the opposite is often the case. By fixing soil health through improving pH and soil organic matter levels, farm output can rise significantly, and greater profits can be achieved, with the vast majority of the increased output being driven by more productive pastures, not additional chemical inputs. The Rodale Institute for example, has proven the impressive performance of regenerative agriculture. Their 38 year trial history of organic vs conventional grain cropping has shown that the regenerative system earns 3 to 6 times more profit then conventional tillage systems.

For most producers, moving towards regenerative agriculture may not need to be a massive mindset change from our conventional farming practices. Small changes can have big effects, not just on soils but also on profits. These changes can be as simple as starting rotational grazing and using high intensity grazing.

Home – American Cattlemen

Here is an article focusing on rebuilding your ranch after disaster

Prefeedlot Vaccination Improves Cattle Health and Growth – American Cattlemen

Here is the Dairy Side of things

Home – American Dairymen

Or if you enjoy the Outdoors. Then the Iowa Sportsman is a great option!

Home – Iowa Sportsman

 

Skip to content