United States Cattlemen’s Association Supports Representative Hageman’s Resolution to Block Mandatory EID

PRESS RELEASE

United States Cattlemen’s Association Supports Representative Hageman’s Resolution to Block Mandatory EID

Calls on Industry to Reinvigorate the Cattle ID Working Group

 

(WASHINGTON)  – July 31, 2024 The United States Cattlemen’s Association (USCA) announced their support of Representative Harriet Hageman’s (R-WY) joint resolution to block the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) rule mandating electronic identification (EID) eartags for bison and cattle moving interstate.

While disease traceability is a priority amongst the industry, there is currently a robust system in place that allows for the flexibilities outlined in USDA’s Animal Disease Traceability Framework and have thus far maintained the health and safety of the American cattle herd.

Mandating EIDs comes with multiple concerns the least of which is the cost associated to implement a mandatory, new system. Funding has yet to be defined and USCA remains adamant that the added cost should not fall upon the producer.

Further, scanning tags at points throughout interstate commerce could create unnecessary delays on shipping and sale days, causing added stress to cattle.

Finally, one of the main concerns is that of the misuse of information gleaned by a mandatory EID system. These new technologies cannot be used for tracking cattle on public or private lands by any government entity or NGO without the permission of the livestock owner, nor should they be associated with promoting specific production practices or unfairly discriminating producers based on adherence to such ideals.

“We commend Representative Hageman for taking a stand for the U.S. cattle industry that protects not only the privacy of our producers, but just as importantly, the flexibility that our dynamic industry requires,” USCA President Justin Tupper said.

Hageman’s bill is cosponsored by 14 representatives and Senator Cynthia Lummis introduced bicameral legislation in the Senate as well.  Upon blocking the proposed mandate, USCA is calling on the cattle industry to reinvigorate the Cattle ID Working Group to fully evaluate potential consequences of any such mandatory rule. This group was successful in developing the 2013 animal disease traceability framework which recognizes visually readable tags, brands, tattoos, and breed registry certificates as official identification.

Contact

Kalina Reini

USCA Director of Policy and Public Affairs

kalina@wssdc.com

202-870-0156

Article and contents courtesy of US Cattlemens Assn.

American and Australian Cattle Producers Commit to Partnership Through Joint Statement Signing

American and Australian Cattle Producers Commit to Partnership Through Joint Statement Signing

Statement Addresses Cattle Health, Sustainability, and Lab-Grown Protein

ROCKHAMPTON, Australia (May 9, 2024) – Today, leaders of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) and Cattle Australia (CA) signed a joint statement at the Beef 2024 convention in Rockhampton, Australia to further the two organizations’ partnership on issues related to cattle health, lab-grown proteins, and sustainability.

“America’s cattle farmers and ranchers stand with Australia’s cattle producers and look forward to being partners in combatting foreign animal diseases, promoting sustainability, and ensuring proper oversight of lab-grown proteins,” said NCBA President Mark Eisele, a Wyoming rancher. “As a rancher, I understand the importance of proactively talking about the good work we do in both countries. Cattle producers provide significant benefits to the global population, from providing safe, wholesome real beef to implementing conservation practices that conserve millions of acres of prime wildlife habitat in the United States and Australia. This joint commitment will strengthen the partnership between American and Australian producers and support our efforts to educate the public on the benefits of raising cattle.”

“In signing the joint statement of priorities, we are encouraging the Australian and U.S. governments to join forces in combating devastating foreign animal diseases; promoting sustainable global trade that encourage efficient production practices; and ensuring science-based food safety and marketing regulations of emerging food technologies such as lab-grown proteins,” said CA Chair Garry Edwards.

The joint statement outlines both countries’ commitment to protecting cattle health and wellbeing with vaccine banks to counter the threat of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). While FMD only impacts cloven-hoofed animals and does not pose a risk to humans, the disease can still cause immense financial harm to farmers and ranchers. The United States has been FMD-free since 1929 and Australia has been FMD-free since 1872.

The statement also addressed the emergence of lab-grown proteins. While there are no lab-grown proteins that imitate beef currently authorized for retail in the U.S., several companies are attempting to bring these products to market. It is critically important that these products are properly vetted by regulatory authorities so they do not pose a potential risk to consumer health and food safety, and it is important that they are labeled in a way that is transparent to consumers so they can choose between naturally produced beef and lab-grown proteins. Additionally, the statement supports efforts to continue sharing information on cattle industry sustainability and promoting the benefits of cattle production such as improving wildlife habitat, natural water filtration, and greenspace protection benefits.

Following the statement signing, NCBA and CA will continue engaging with their respective governments to secure policies that protect cattle health, recognize the cattle industry’s sustainability, and ensure proper oversight of lab-grown protein.

View the statement here.

Download audio for broadcast here.

###

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) has represented America’s cattle producers since 1898, preserving the heritage and strength of the industry through education and public policy.  As the largest association of cattle producers, NCBA works to create new markets and increase demand for beef.  Efforts are made possible through membership contributions. To join, contact NCBA at 1-866-BEEF-USA or membership@beef.org.

NATIONAL CATTLEMEN’S BEEF ASSOCIATION CONTACT:
Hunter Ihrman, hihrman@beef.org
Steve Johnson, srjohnson@beef.org
CATTLE AUSTRALIA CONTACT:
Hayley Kennedy, hayley.kennedy@bluehillpr.com.au
Stacey Wordsworth, stacey.wordsworth@bluehillpr.com.au

Farm Custom Rate Survey Shows What Iowans are Charging and Paying in 2024

Farm Custom Rate Survey Shows What Iowans are Charging and Paying in 2024

Newly released survey includes averages and ranges for popular farming tasks in Iowa

Article courtesy of Iowa State University Extension and Outreach

AMES, Iowa – Farmers who depend on custom work or provide custom services can review rates charged by others across the state in the latest Iowa Farm Custom Rate Survey.

The 2024 report was published in the March edition of Ag Decision Maker and includes 130 responses and 2,805 custom rates provided by Iowa farmers, custom operators and farm managers.

Farm tasks in the report include everything from planting to harvest, with cost data that reflect the average, median and range for each task.

The rates in the report are expected to be charged or paid in 2024, and they include fuel and labor (unless otherwise noted). The average price for diesel fuel (highway-retail including taxes) was assumed to be $3.92 per gallon (as projected by the U.S. Energy Information Administration in early February 2024). Rental rates for some machinery items are shown in the last section of the report, along with a worksheet for estimating rental rates for other items.

Ann Johanns, program specialist with Iowa State University Extension and Outreach and editor of Ag Decision Maker, said this year’s numbers seem more in line with the current farm economy.

“We’ve seen increases in rates the past two years (3% to 10% and 10% to 15%),” said Johanns. “The steady to slight decline in rates generally seen across the 2024 survey is closer to changes observed prior to the last two years.”

While the projected fuel price increased, production challenges and crop prices seem to have impacted custom rates as well.

Johanns said it’s important for custom operators to know the market for custom farming and to know their costs.

“If the custom operator isn’t covering their costs, they are operating at a loss,” she said. “If they don’t have a good handle on their cost to operate, there are helpful resources on Ag Decision Maker.”

New for 2024 is additional insight into who responded to each operation shown. Of the 2,468 who responded with usable rates: 48% are service providers, 32% are service users, 8% are both service providers and users, and 12% are unknown. The sources of the 69 rates reported for machinery rentals are: 38% machinery owners, 35% machinery renters, 11% machinery owners and renters, and 12% unknown. The sources of the 108 rates reported for wages are: 81% employers, 7% employees, 2% employer and employee, and 9% unknown.

The rate survey is intended only as a guide. Actual custom rates may vary according to availability of machinery in a given area, timeliness, operator skill, field size and shape, crop conditions and the performance characteristics of the machine being used.

“Ultimately, the Custom Rate survey is a starting point in discussions, but any custom rate charged, or paid, should cover the operator’s cost of owning and operating the machinery being used,” said Johanns. “Just using the results of the survey alone might not be the right answer for an individual operation.”

Skip to content